As Sure As Obamacare And Taxes

8 Aug

I felt like being provocative

Obamacare mandates “An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title.”

Obamacare also mandates “training for health care professionals across the continuum of care about the goals and use of orders for life sustaining treatment”

So under Obamacare professionals will be taught the goals of life sustaining treatment and then be expected to regularly consult with their patients about the continuum of end-of-life services available including palliative care. Palliative care is medical care that focuses on reducing the symptoms of a disease rather than attempting to cure or delay the progression of the disease.

You’re old, but you’re not yet ready to die. Or, perhaps you have pancreatic cancer, but you wish to fight as long as possible. You’ll have meetings with authoritative professionals who will advise you on “end-of-life” services. Can we imagine how such a meeting may go? Would statements like, At this point we’re just prolonging the inevitable, We can make you comfortable, and I know this is hard for you and your family, be used? Such words could be taken as, You’re a burden to your family, Stop prolonging the inevitable and Just take the pain pills.

End-of-life treatment is a tricky thing. All treatments need to be on the table, but do we want to create a system where all the incentives encourage death? The reality is that the elderly are the greatest cost burden on our health care system. Is it really impossible to imagine that when a single payer system is in place, and they are desperately looking for cost cutting measures, a general disdain will take hold for those elderly folks who choose to hang on to life? The only real solution to this problem, that doesn’t result in resentment of the elderly, is a system that drives down health care costs, while maintaining the quality of services. This can only happen when real competition is allowed to take place, but that isn’t what Obamacare creates.

Obamacare all but guarantees a future in which everyone is under the federal government managed health care system. A system without market forces driving innovation or cost savings. Instead cost savings will be dependent on a handful of bureaucrats. We’ve seen this top down management system fail in the former soviet union and it will fail here as well. A bureaucracy will never be as efficient or effective as the market and that is demonstrated by our rising health care costs. Vested union interests and bureaucrats will burden an already bulky system and further increase the cost of care. Redundancy will build up and, like every other government program, they will continue to petition congress for more funds. If government was actually competent, they would occasionally come in under budget. But that’s not how government works.

Health insurance in the United States can be better. We already have the best quality health care; the problems are in the areas of cost and insurance coverage. Insufficient coverage of course being directly related, in part, to cost. Therefore the first goal of any reform should be the reduction in health care costs. This can only happen if market forces are introduced through consumer empowerment. Unfortunately Obamacare kills competition in the long run and will undermine the forces behind medical breakthroughs and innovation. Change is needed, but Obamacare is change for the worse.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “As Sure As Obamacare And Taxes”

  1. Health care -- how do we move forward August 8, 2009 at 4:26 PM #

    It is important that we make sure that these types of events are broadcast by the media. We need to make sure that the American people see the entire debate – the pros and the cons.

    Open, honest and complete, that’s coverage we must demand.

    This is two important for ANY side of this debate to hijack it, to paint the others as thugs, terroists, or worse Nazi (Pelosi). If we cannot have open debate on an issue of this importance, what is the Bill of Rights about? Freedom of Press, Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of Speech — they cannot be just words on a piece of paper.

    Now is the time to cash in what we have fought valiently for and memorialized in every monument to our fallen soldiers, at Arlington National Cemetary and many of the other institutions such as VFW, American Legion and the like.

    http://www.ilovebenefits.wordpress.com

  2. Dede August 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM #

    As usual, you are smarter and more eloquent than I. I do not understand people’s love of this man or acceptance of his policies. This particular incarnation of our government has done more in the last 200 days to change the very core of America than all other administrations over the last 200 years. This is a power grab pure and simple, and I believe this administration is going to be shocked and awed at the lengths we will go to to take the power back.

  3. Candice August 9, 2009 at 6:58 AM #

    But what about all those poor people who can’t afford medical insurance? How is it fair for all you rich people to be able to afford to go to the doctor and stay all healthy and stuff? You rich people don’t even need insurance, you can afford to pay for all your medical expenses out of pocket, quit your bitching!

    Ok, now on a real note: Obamacare scares me, much more than any program/bill/etc he will propose in the future. I don’t really think about it from my perspective so much, as I am mostly healthy, but I think about how it will effect my parents and grandparents and aunts and uncles. I do not want some bureaucrat either forcing or suggesting my parents make some end-of-life decisions to cut costs, should anything ever happen to them. Its hard enough to deal with the illness/death of a family member, could you imagine skipping over the suggestions of your doctor and having to follow rules and guidelines from some jackass sitting behind a desk doing cost/benefit analysis for the general population? Just the thought of that makes me shiver.

    Speaking of cost, where is Obama going to get all this damn money? As I mentioned in my cash for clunkers blog, if they’re so quick to spend more money (two billion to be exact) on that sham of a program, could you imagine how quickly they’re going to need 200 billion or even 2 trillion more for health care?

    Ok rant over. Good stuff. 🙂

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. As Sure As Obamacare And Taxes | cancer research - August 8, 2009

    […] Original post:  As Sure As Obamacare And Taxes […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: